On the occasion of her ninetieth birthday,
in 1993, friends of celebrated New England artist Maud Morgan honored
her accomplishments and spirit by establishing an award that acknowledges
women artists at mid-career who reside in Massachusetts. In 1994
the Museum of Fine Arts and an expanded group of admirers contributed
to this original fund, making it a permanent award that includes
an addition of art to the collections of the MFA.
Although Morgan passed away in 1999, at the age of ninety-six,
recipients of the Maud Morgan Prize continue to demonstrate her
independence and spirit of adventure. During her most active years
as an artist and instructor, Morgan came to represente women who
struggled with commitment to a career in the arts at a time when
the traditional roles of women were emphasized. She was associated
with distinguished artists and writers of the 1930s, including
James Joyce and Ernest Hemingway, and she studied at the Art Students
League in New York with Hans Hofmann. Morgan exhibited with Betty
Parsons Gallery in New York, in the company of Jackson Pollock
and Mark Rothko, before becoming an influential teacher—with her
then-husband, painter Patrick Morgan—at Abbot Academy and Phillips
Academy, Andover, Massachusetts.
The Museum is pleased to award the eleventh Maud Morgan Prize to Jill Weber.
Weber graduated in 2004 from the School of the Museum of Fine Arts Fifth Year
Program and studied architecture at Cornell University (B.S. 1960) and the
State University of New York at Buffalo (M.A. 1980), before moving to Boston.
She pursued a career in development and marketing, eventually founding the
Boston Society of Architects Marketing Service. Making art, however, has always
been part of her life, and she has an abiding interest in the construction
of an image, inspired and informed by her study of architecture. In this series
of paintings, the skylight and the metaphorical view it allows provided Weber
with a means to create flat, abstract compositions that allude to immeasurable
depth. She suggests contrasting planes through the simplicity of exact lines
and the painted illusion of tape against a field of laboriously layered oil
paint. The contradictions in these precise compositions echo that of the subject
matter, for the view through a broken plane is both a reference to escape and
an acknowledgement of confinement. |
|


 
|